Qwen3 32B vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison
Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Qwen3 32B about 74% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Qwen3 32B lists approximately 74% lower than DeepSeek V4 Pro. For high-throughput production workloads, Qwen3 32B delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation
Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Qwen3 32B listed rate totals ~$2.70, while DeepSeek V4 Pro totals ~$10.56. Switching to Qwen3 32B yields ~$7.86/mo in raw token savings.
Metric
Qwen3 32B (AWS Bedrock)
DeepSeek V4 Pro (DeepSeek)
Input listed rate
$0.15 / 1M Tokens
$0.66 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$0.60 / 1M Tokens
$1.98 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
—
$0.02 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
33K Tokens
1000K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm
🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards
Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.
Want to map listed prices to your usage?
Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.