Skip to content
ModelPriceLab

Search model prices

Find source-linked rates by model, vendor, or platform.

Model Services/Claude Opus 5 (AU) vs GPT-4o
AWS Bedrock
OpenAI

Claude Opus 5 (AU) vs GPT-4o

2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison

GPT-4o

Deprecated

Deprecated endpoints may still be callable. Migrate before retirement.

Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
GPT-4o about 59% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, GPT-4o lists approximately 59% lower than Claude Opus 5 (AU). For high-throughput production workloads, GPT-4o delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation

Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Claude Opus 5 (AU) listed rate totals ~$110.00, while GPT-4o totals ~$45.00. Switching to GPT-4o yields ~$65.00/mo in raw token savings.

Model Your Workload →
Metric
Claude Opus 5 (AU) (AWS Bedrock)
GPT-4o (OpenAI)
Input listed rate
$5.50 / 1M Tokens
$2.50 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$27.50 / 1M Tokens
$10.00 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.55 / 1M Tokens
$1.25 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
1000K Tokens
128K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm

🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards

Evaluate how these models rank across real production scenarios based on quality, latency, and cost weights.

Want to map listed prices to your usage?

Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.