Skip to content
ModelPriceLab

Search model prices

Find source-linked rates by model, vendor, or platform.

Model Services/gpt-oss-120b vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
AWS Bedrock
DeepSeek

gpt-oss-120b vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison

Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
gpt-oss-120b about 74% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, gpt-oss-120b lists approximately 74% lower than DeepSeek V4 Pro. For high-throughput production workloads, gpt-oss-120b delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation

Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): gpt-oss-120b listed rate totals ~$2.70, while DeepSeek V4 Pro totals ~$10.56. Switching to gpt-oss-120b yields ~$7.86/mo in raw token savings.

Model Your Workload →
Metric
gpt-oss-120b (AWS Bedrock)
DeepSeek V4 Pro (DeepSeek)
Input listed rate
$0.15 / 1M Tokens
$0.66 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$0.60 / 1M Tokens
$1.98 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
—
$0.02 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
131K Tokens
1000K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm

🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards

Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.

Want to map listed prices to your usage?

Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.