Skip to content
ModelPriceLab

Search model prices

Find source-linked rates by model, vendor, or platform.

Model Services/GPT-3.5 Turbo 1106 vs Claude Sonnet 5
Microsoft Azure
Anthropic

GPT-3.5 Turbo 1106 vs Claude Sonnet 5

2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison

GPT-3.5 Turbo 1106

Deprecated

Deprecated endpoints may still be callable. Migrate before retirement.

Claude Sonnet 5

Legacy / Superseded

Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.

Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
GPT-3.5 Turbo 1106 about 65% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, GPT-3.5 Turbo 1106 lists approximately 65% lower than Claude Sonnet 5. For high-throughput production workloads, GPT-3.5 Turbo 1106 delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-10-11 (UTC))
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation

Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): GPT-3.5 Turbo 1106 listed rate totals ~$14.00, while Claude Sonnet 5 totals ~$40.00. Switching to GPT-3.5 Turbo 1106 yields ~$26.00/mo in raw token savings.

Model Your Workload →
Metric
GPT-3.5 Turbo 1106 (Microsoft Azure)
Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic)
Input listed rate
$1.00 / 1M Tokens
$2.00 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$2.00 / 1M Tokens
$10.00 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
—
$0.20 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
16K Tokens
1000K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm

🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards

Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.

Want to map listed prices to your usage?

Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.