Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct FP8 vs Claude Sonnet 5
2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison
Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct FP8 about 89% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct FP8 lists approximately 89% lower than Claude Sonnet 5. For high-throughput production workloads, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct FP8 delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-10-22 (UTC))
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation
Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct FP8 listed rate totals ~$4.50, while Claude Sonnet 5 totals ~$40.00. Switching to Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct FP8 yields ~$35.50/mo in raw token savings.
Metric
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct FP8 (Microsoft Azure)
Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic)
Input listed rate
$0.25 / 1M Tokens
$2.00 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$1.00 / 1M Tokens
$10.00 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
—
$0.20 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
1000K Tokens
1000K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm
🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards
Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.
Want to map listed prices to your usage?
Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.