Skip to content
ModelPriceLab

Search model prices

Find source-linked rates by model, vendor, or platform.

Model Services/ERNIE 3.5 128k vs Claude Sonnet 5
Baidu
Anthropic

ERNIE 3.5 128k vs Claude Sonnet 5

2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison

ERNIE 3.5 128k

Legacy / Superseded

Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.

Claude Sonnet 5

Legacy / Superseded

Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.

Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
ERNIE 3.5 128k about 96% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, ERNIE 3.5 128k lists approximately 96% lower than Claude Sonnet 5. For high-throughput production workloads, ERNIE 3.5 128k delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-10-11 (UTC))
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation

Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): ERNIE 3.5 128k listed rate totals ~$1.68, while Claude Sonnet 5 totals ~$40.00. Switching to ERNIE 3.5 128k yields ~$38.32/mo in raw token savings.

Model Your Workload →
Metric
ERNIE 3.5 128k (Baidu)
Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic)
Input listed rate
$0.11 / 1M Tokens
$2.00 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$0.28 / 1M Tokens
$10.00 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.03 / 1M Tokens
$0.20 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
128K Tokens
1000K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm

🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards

Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.

Want to map listed prices to your usage?

Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.