ERNIE 3.5 128k vs GPT-4o
2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison
GPT-4o
Deprecated
Deprecated endpoints may still be callable. Migrate before retirement.
Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
ERNIE 3.5 128k about 96% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, ERNIE 3.5 128k lists approximately 96% lower than GPT-4o. For high-throughput production workloads, ERNIE 3.5 128k delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation
Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): ERNIE 3.5 128k listed rate totals ~$1.68, while GPT-4o totals ~$45.00. Switching to ERNIE 3.5 128k yields ~$43.32/mo in raw token savings.
Metric
ERNIE 3.5 128k (Baidu)
GPT-4o (OpenAI)
Input listed rate
$0.11 / 1M Tokens
$2.50 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$0.28 / 1M Tokens
$10.00 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.03 / 1M Tokens
$1.25 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
128K Tokens
128K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm
🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards
Evaluate how these models rank across real production scenarios based on quality, latency, and cost weights.
Want to map listed prices to your usage?
Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.