Skip to content
ModelPriceLab

Search model prices

Find source-linked rates by model, vendor, or platform.

Model Services/Seed 1.6 Vision vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
ByteDance
Google AI

Seed 1.6 Vision vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison

Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Seed 1.6 Vision about 89% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Seed 1.6 Vision lists approximately 89% lower than Gemini 2.5 Pro. For high-throughput production workloads, Seed 1.6 Vision delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation

Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Seed 1.6 Vision listed rate totals ~$3.56, while Gemini 2.5 Pro totals ~$32.50. Switching to Seed 1.6 Vision yields ~$28.94/mo in raw token savings.

Model Your Workload →
Metric
Seed 1.6 Vision (ByteDance)
Gemini 2.5 Pro (Google AI)
Input listed rate
$0.12 / 1M Tokens
$1.25 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$1.19 / 1M Tokens
$10.00 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.02 / 1M Tokens
$0.13 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
256K Tokens
1049K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm

🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards

Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.

Want to map listed prices to your usage?

Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.