Seed 1.6 Vision vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison
Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Seed 1.6 Vision about 40% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Seed 1.6 Vision lists approximately 40% lower than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct. For high-throughput production workloads, Seed 1.6 Vision delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation
Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Seed 1.6 Vision listed rate totals ~$3.56, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct totals ~$5.90. Switching to Seed 1.6 Vision yields ~$2.34/mo in raw token savings.
Metric
Seed 1.6 Vision (ByteDance)
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct (Qwen)
Input listed rate
$0.12 / 1M Tokens
$0.21 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$1.19 / 1M Tokens
$1.90 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.02 / 1M Tokens
$0.10 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
256K Tokens
262K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm
🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards
Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.
Want to map listed prices to your usage?
Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.