Skip to content
ModelPriceLab

Search model prices

Find source-linked rates by model, vendor, or platform.

Model Services/Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
ByteDance
Google AI

Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison

Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Seed 2.1 Turbo about 41% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Seed 2.1 Turbo lists approximately 41% lower than Gemini 3.8 Flash. For high-throughput production workloads, Seed 2.1 Turbo delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation

Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Seed 2.1 Turbo listed rate totals ~$8.91, while Gemini 3.8 Flash totals ~$15.00. Switching to Seed 2.1 Turbo yields ~$6.09/mo in raw token savings.

Model Your Workload →
Metric
Seed 2.1 Turbo (ByteDance)
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Google AI)
Input listed rate
$0.45 / 1M Tokens
$0.75 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$2.23 / 1M Tokens
$3.75 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.09 / 1M Tokens
$0.08 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
256K Tokens
1049K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm

🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards

Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.

Want to map listed prices to your usage?

Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.