Claude Sonnet 5 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro (batch)
2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison
Claude Sonnet 5
Legacy / Superseded
Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.
Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Kimi K3.1 Pro (batch) about 52% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Kimi K3.1 Pro (batch) lists approximately 52% lower than Claude Sonnet 5. For high-throughput production workloads, Kimi K3.1 Pro (batch) delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-11-13 (UTC))
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation
Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Claude Sonnet 5 listed rate totals ~$40.00, while Kimi K3.1 Pro (batch) totals ~$19.00. Switching to Kimi K3.1 Pro (batch) yields ~$21.00/mo in raw token savings.
Metric
Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic)
Kimi K3.1 Pro (batch) (Moonshot AI)
Input listed rate
$2.00 / 1M Tokens
$0.70 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$10.00 / 1M Tokens
$6.00 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.20 / 1M Tokens
$0.10 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
1000K Tokens
1049K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm
🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards
Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.
Want to map listed prices to your usage?
Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.