R1 0528 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison
Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
R1 0528 about 77% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, R1 0528 lists approximately 77% lower than Claude Sonnet 5.5. For high-throughput production workloads, R1 0528 delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation
Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): R1 0528 listed rate totals ~$9.30, while Claude Sonnet 5.5 totals ~$40.00. Switching to R1 0528 yields ~$30.70/mo in raw token savings.
Metric
R1 0528 (DeepSeek)
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic)
Input listed rate
$0.50 / 1M Tokens
$2.00 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$2.15 / 1M Tokens
$10.00 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.35 / 1M Tokens
$0.20 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
164K Tokens
1000K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm
🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards
Evaluate how these models rank across real production scenarios based on quality, latency, and cost weights.
Want to map listed prices to your usage?
Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.