Skip to content
ModelPriceLab

Search model prices

Find source-linked rates by model, vendor, or platform.

Model Services/DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Claude Sonnet 5
DeepSeek
Anthropic

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Claude Sonnet 5

2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Legacy / Superseded

Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.

Replacement reference: deepseek-deepseek-flash

Claude Sonnet 5

Legacy / Superseded

Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.

Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 about 93% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 lists approximately 93% lower than Claude Sonnet 5. For high-throughput production workloads, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation

Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 listed rate totals ~$2.71, while Claude Sonnet 5 totals ~$40.00. Switching to DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 yields ~$37.29/mo in raw token savings.

Model Your Workload →
Metric
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (DeepSeek)
Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic)
Input listed rate
$0.02 / 1M Tokens
$2.00 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$1.28 / 1M Tokens
$10.00 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.02 / 1M Tokens
$0.20 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
1049K Tokens
1000K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm

🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards

Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.

Want to map listed prices to your usage?

Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.