DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemma 2 27B
2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison
Gemma 2 27B
Legacy / Superseded
Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.
Replacement reference: google-gemma-4-26b-a4b-itIllustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Gemma 2 27B about 26% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Gemma 2 27B lists approximately 26% lower than DeepSeek V4 Pro. For high-throughput production workloads, Gemma 2 27B delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-10-11 (UTC))
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation
Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): DeepSeek V4 Pro listed rate totals ~$10.56, while Gemma 2 27B totals ~$7.80. Switching to Gemma 2 27B yields ~$2.76/mo in raw token savings.
Metric
DeepSeek V4 Pro (DeepSeek)
Gemma 2 27B (Google AI)
Input listed rate
$0.66 / 1M Tokens
$0.65 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$1.98 / 1M Tokens
$0.65 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.02 / 1M Tokens
—
Context Window
1000K Tokens
8K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm
🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards
Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.
Want to map listed prices to your usage?
Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.