DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Deprecated
Deprecated endpoints may still be callable. Migrate before retirement.
Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 about 100% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 lists approximately 100% lower than DeepSeek V4 Pro. For high-throughput production workloads, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-10-11 (UTC))
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation
Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): DeepSeek V4 Pro listed rate totals ~$10.56, while Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 totals ~$0.00. Switching to Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 yields ~$10.56/mo in raw token savings.
Metric
DeepSeek V4 Pro (DeepSeek)
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (NVIDIA)
Input listed rate
$0.66 / 1M Tokens
$0.0000 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$1.98 / 1M Tokens
$0.0000 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.02 / 1M Tokens
—
Context Window
1000K Tokens
131K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm
🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards
Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.
Want to map listed prices to your usage?
Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.