o
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison
Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash about 77% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash lists approximately 77% lower than DeepSeek V4 Pro. For high-throughput production workloads, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-10-11 (UTC))
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation
Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): DeepSeek V4 Pro listed rate totals ~$10.56, while Qwen3.8 Omni Flash totals ~$2.44. Switching to Qwen3.8 Omni Flash yields ~$8.12/mo in raw token savings.
Metric
DeepSeek V4 Pro (DeepSeek)
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash (openrouter)
Input listed rate
$0.66 / 1M Tokens
$0.15 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$1.98 / 1M Tokens
$0.47 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.02 / 1M Tokens
$0.02 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
1000K Tokens
1000K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm
🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards
Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.
Want to map listed prices to your usage?
Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.