Skip to content
ModelPriceLab

Search model prices

Find source-linked rates by model, vendor, or platform.

Model Services/DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Llama 3 8B Lunaris
DeepSeek
s

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Llama 3 8B Lunaris

2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison

Llama 3 8B Lunaris

Deprecated

Deprecated endpoints may still be callable. Migrate before retirement.

Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Llama 3 8B Lunaris about 95% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Llama 3 8B Lunaris lists approximately 95% lower than DeepSeek V4 Pro. For high-throughput production workloads, Llama 3 8B Lunaris delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-10-11 (UTC))
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation

Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): DeepSeek V4 Pro listed rate totals ~$10.56, while Llama 3 8B Lunaris totals ~$0.50. Switching to Llama 3 8B Lunaris yields ~$10.06/mo in raw token savings.

Model Your Workload →
Metric
DeepSeek V4 Pro (DeepSeek)
Llama 3 8B Lunaris (sao10k)
Input listed rate
$0.66 / 1M Tokens
$0.04 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$1.98 / 1M Tokens
$0.05 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.02 / 1M Tokens
—
Context Window
1000K Tokens
8K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm

🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards

Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.

Want to map listed prices to your usage?

Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.