Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison
Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct about 82% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct lists approximately 82% lower than Gemini 2.5 Pro. For high-throughput production workloads, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-10-11 (UTC))
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation
Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Gemini 2.5 Pro listed rate totals ~$32.50, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct totals ~$5.90. Switching to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct yields ~$26.60/mo in raw token savings.
Metric
Gemini 2.5 Pro (Google AI)
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct (Qwen)
Input listed rate
$1.25 / 1M Tokens
$0.21 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$10.00 / 1M Tokens
$1.90 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.13 / 1M Tokens
$0.10 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
1049K Tokens
262K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm
🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards
Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.
Want to map listed prices to your usage?
Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.