Skip to content
ModelPriceLab

Search model prices

Find source-linked rates by model, vendor, or platform.

Model Services/Gemini 3.7 Flash vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
Google AI
Groq

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Legacy / Superseded

Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.

Replacement reference: gemini-3.8-flash
Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B about 37% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B lists approximately 37% lower than Gemini 3.7 Flash. For high-throughput production workloads, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-10-11 (UTC))
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation

Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Gemini 3.7 Flash listed rate totals ~$15.00, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B totals ~$9.48. Switching to DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B yields ~$5.52/mo in raw token savings.

Model Your Workload →
Metric
Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google AI)
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B (Groq)
Input listed rate
$0.75 / 1M Tokens
$0.75 / 1M tokens
Output listed rate
$3.75 / 1M Tokens
$0.99 / 1M tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.08 / 1M Tokens
—
Context Window
1049K Tokens
—
Modality
llm
llm

🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards

Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.

Want to map listed prices to your usage?

Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.