Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Hunyuan Standard 256k
2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Legacy / Superseded
Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.
Replacement reference: gemini-3.8-flashIllustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Hunyuan Standard 256k about 89% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Hunyuan Standard 256k lists approximately 89% lower than Gemini 3.7 Flash. For high-throughput production workloads, Hunyuan Standard 256k delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-10-11 (UTC))
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation
Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Gemini 3.7 Flash listed rate totals ~$15.00, while Hunyuan Standard 256k totals ~$1.68. Switching to Hunyuan Standard 256k yields ~$13.32/mo in raw token savings.
Metric
Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google AI)
Hunyuan Standard 256k (Tencent)
Input listed rate
$0.75 / 1M Tokens
$0.11 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$3.75 / 1M Tokens
$0.28 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.08 / 1M Tokens
$0.03 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
1049K Tokens
256K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm
🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards
Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.
Want to map listed prices to your usage?
Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.