Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Hunyuan TurboS
2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Legacy / Superseded
Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.
Replacement reference: gemini-3.8-flashIllustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Hunyuan TurboS about 83% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Hunyuan TurboS lists approximately 83% lower than Gemini 3.7 Flash. For high-throughput production workloads, Hunyuan TurboS delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-10-11 (UTC))
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation
Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Gemini 3.7 Flash listed rate totals ~$15.00, while Hunyuan TurboS totals ~$2.52. Switching to Hunyuan TurboS yields ~$12.48/mo in raw token savings.
Metric
Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google AI)
Hunyuan TurboS (Tencent)
Input listed rate
$0.75 / 1M Tokens
$0.14 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$3.75 / 1M Tokens
$0.56 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.08 / 1M Tokens
$0.03 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
1049K Tokens
128K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm
🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards
Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.
Want to map listed prices to your usage?
Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.