Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo
2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Legacy / Superseded
Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.
Replacement reference: gemini-3.8-flashIllustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo about 28% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo lists approximately 28% lower than Gemini 3.7 Flash. For high-throughput production workloads, Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-10-11 (UTC))
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation
Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Gemini 3.7 Flash listed rate totals ~$15.00, while Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo totals ~$10.80. Switching to Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo yields ~$4.20/mo in raw token savings.
Metric
Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google AI)
Qwen 2.5 72B Turbo (Together AI)
Input listed rate
$0.75 / 1M Tokens
$0.90 / 1M tokens
Output listed rate
$3.75 / 1M Tokens
$0.90 / 1M tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.08 / 1M Tokens
—
Context Window
1049K Tokens
—
Modality
llm
llm
🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards
Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.
Want to map listed prices to your usage?
Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.