Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B
2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison
Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Beam 1.0 501B A23B about 57% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Beam 1.0 501B A23B lists approximately 57% lower than Gemini 3.7 Flash. For high-throughput production workloads, Beam 1.0 501B A23B delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-10-22 (UTC))
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation
Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Gemini 3.7 Flash listed rate totals ~$15.00, while Beam 1.0 501B A23B totals ~$6.40. Switching to Beam 1.0 501B A23B yields ~$8.60/mo in raw token savings.
Metric
Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google AI)
Beam 1.0 501B A23B (Together AI)
Input listed rate
$0.75 / 1M Tokens
$0.40 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$3.75 / 1M Tokens
$1.20 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.08 / 1M Tokens
$0.04 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
1049K Tokens
1049K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm
🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards
Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.
Want to map listed prices to your usage?
Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.