o
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs GPT-4o
2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison
GPT-4o
Deprecated
Deprecated endpoints may still be callable. Migrate before retirement.
Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct about 81% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct lists approximately 81% lower than GPT-4o. For high-throughput production workloads, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation
Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct listed rate totals ~$8.60, while GPT-4o totals ~$45.00. Switching to Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct yields ~$36.40/mo in raw token savings.
Metric
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct (openrouter)
GPT-4o (OpenAI)
Input listed rate
$0.66 / 1M Tokens
$2.50 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$1.00 / 1M Tokens
$10.00 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
—
$1.25 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
33K Tokens
128K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm
🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards
Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.
Want to map listed prices to your usage?
Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.