o
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-4o
2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison
GPT-4o
Deprecated
Deprecated endpoints may still be callable. Migrate before retirement.
Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 about 85% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 lists approximately 85% lower than GPT-4o. For high-throughput production workloads, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation
Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 listed rate totals ~$6.80, while GPT-4o totals ~$45.00. Switching to Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 yields ~$38.20/mo in raw token savings.
Metric
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 (openrouter)
GPT-4o (OpenAI)
Input listed rate
$0.20 / 1M Tokens
$2.50 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$2.40 / 1M Tokens
$10.00 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
—
$1.25 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
82K Tokens
128K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm
🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards
Evaluate how these models rank across real production scenarios based on quality, latency, and cost weights.
Want to map listed prices to your usage?
Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.