o
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison
Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B about 67% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B lists approximately 67% lower than DeepSeek V4 Pro. For high-throughput production workloads, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation
Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Qwen3.5 35B-A3B listed rate totals ~$3.50, while DeepSeek V4 Pro totals ~$10.56. Switching to Qwen3.5 35B-A3B yields ~$7.06/mo in raw token savings.
Metric
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B (openrouter)
DeepSeek V4 Pro (DeepSeek)
Input listed rate
$0.15 / 1M Tokens
$0.66 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$1.00 / 1M Tokens
$1.98 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.05 / 1M Tokens
$0.02 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
262K Tokens
1000K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm
🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards
Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.
Want to map listed prices to your usage?
Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.