Skip to content
ModelPriceLab

Search model prices

Find source-linked rates by model, vendor, or platform.

Model Services/Relace Apply 3 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash
o
Google AI

Relace Apply 3 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Legacy / Superseded

Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.

Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Relace Apply 3 about 27% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Relace Apply 3 lists approximately 27% lower than Gemini 3.7 Flash. For high-throughput production workloads, Relace Apply 3 delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation

Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Relace Apply 3 listed rate totals ~$11.00, while Gemini 3.7 Flash totals ~$15.00. Switching to Relace Apply 3 yields ~$4.00/mo in raw token savings.

Model Your Workload →
Metric
Relace Apply 3 (openrouter)
Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google AI)
Input listed rate
$0.85 / 1M Tokens
$0.75 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$1.25 / 1M Tokens
$3.75 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
—
$0.08 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
256K Tokens
1049K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm

🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards

Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.

Want to map listed prices to your usage?

Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.