Skip to content
ModelPriceLab

Search model prices

Find source-linked rates by model, vendor, or platform.

Model Services/Skyfall 36B V2 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash
o
Google AI

Skyfall 36B V2 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Legacy / Superseded

Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.

Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Skyfall 36B V2 about 53% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Skyfall 36B V2 lists approximately 53% lower than Gemini 3.7 Flash. For high-throughput production workloads, Skyfall 36B V2 delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation

Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Skyfall 36B V2 listed rate totals ~$7.10, while Gemini 3.7 Flash totals ~$15.00. Switching to Skyfall 36B V2 yields ~$7.90/mo in raw token savings.

Model Your Workload →
Metric
Skyfall 36B V2 (openrouter)
Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google AI)
Input listed rate
$0.55 / 1M Tokens
$0.75 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$0.80 / 1M Tokens
$3.75 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.25 / 1M Tokens
$0.08 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
33K Tokens
1049K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm

🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards

Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.

Want to map listed prices to your usage?

Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.