Skip to content
ModelPriceLab

Search model prices

Find source-linked rates by model, vendor, or platform.

Model Services/Pareto vs GPT-4o
o
OpenAI

Pareto vs GPT-4o

2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison

GPT-4o

Deprecated

Deprecated endpoints may still be callable. Migrate before retirement.

Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Pareto about 11% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Pareto lists approximately 11% lower than GPT-4o. For high-throughput production workloads, Pareto delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation

Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Pareto listed rate totals ~$40.00, while GPT-4o totals ~$45.00. Switching to Pareto yields ~$5.00/mo in raw token savings.

Model Your Workload →
Metric
Pareto (openrouter)
GPT-4o (OpenAI)
Input listed rate
$2.50 / 1M Tokens
$2.50 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$7.50 / 1M Tokens
$10.00 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.25 / 1M Tokens
$1.25 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
262K Tokens
128K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm

🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards

Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.

Want to map listed prices to your usage?

Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.