Skip to content
ModelPriceLab

Search model prices

Find source-linked rates by model, vendor, or platform.

Model Services/GLM-5V-Turbo vs Gemini 3.7 Flash
o
Google AI

GLM-5V-Turbo vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Legacy / Superseded

Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.

Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Gemini 3.7 Flash about 25% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Gemini 3.7 Flash lists approximately 25% lower than GLM-5V-Turbo. For high-throughput production workloads, Gemini 3.7 Flash delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation

Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): GLM-5V-Turbo listed rate totals ~$20.00, while Gemini 3.7 Flash totals ~$15.00. Switching to Gemini 3.7 Flash yields ~$5.00/mo in raw token savings.

Model Your Workload →
Metric
GLM-5V-Turbo (openrouter)
Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google AI)
Input listed rate
$1.20 / 1M Tokens
$0.75 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$4.00 / 1M Tokens
$3.75 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.24 / 1M Tokens
$0.08 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
203K Tokens
1049K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm

🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards

Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.

Want to map listed prices to your usage?

Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.