Qwen3.8 Max vs Claude Opus 5.5
2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison
Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Qwen3.8 Max about 60% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Qwen3.8 Max lists approximately 60% lower than Claude Opus 5.5. For high-throughput production workloads, Qwen3.8 Max delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-10-11 (UTC))
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation
Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Qwen3.8 Max listed rate totals ~$32.00, while Claude Opus 5.5 totals ~$80.00. Switching to Qwen3.8 Max yields ~$48.00/mo in raw token savings.
Metric
Qwen3.8 Max (Qwen)
Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic)
Input listed rate
$2.00 / 1M Tokens
$4.00 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$6.00 / 1M Tokens
$20.00 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.25 / 1M Tokens
$0.20 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
1000K Tokens
1000K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm
🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards
Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.
Want to map listed prices to your usage?
Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.