GLM-4.7-FlashX vs DeepSeek V3
2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison
GLM-4.7-FlashX
Legacy / Superseded
Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.
Replacement reference: z-ai-glm-5.3-flashxDeepSeek V3
Deprecated
Deprecated endpoints may still be callable. Migrate before retirement.
Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
GLM-4.7-FlashX about 69% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, GLM-4.7-FlashX lists approximately 69% lower than DeepSeek V3. For high-throughput production workloads, GLM-4.7-FlashX delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation
Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): GLM-4.7-FlashX listed rate totals ~$1.50, while DeepSeek V3 totals ~$4.90. Switching to GLM-4.7-FlashX yields ~$3.40/mo in raw token savings.
Metric
GLM-4.7-FlashX (Z-AI (GLM))
DeepSeek V3 (DeepSeek)
Input listed rate
$0.07 / 1M Tokens
$0.27 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$0.40 / 1M Tokens
$1.10 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.01 / 1M Tokens
$0.07 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
200K Tokens
66K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm
🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards
Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.
Want to map listed prices to your usage?
Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.